Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Blog Widget by LinkWithin

« Unilever, P&G Battle Over Sustainablity Claims | Main | OASIS First U.S. Organic Standard for the Beauty and Personal Care Industry »

March 05, 2008

Comments

Mike

Good read.. P&G as always - staying on top :)

Mike
www.abc-packaging.com

R Parton

First, I would put a different spin on this article. The sustainability factor for packaging is actually a by-product of taking a more sustainable route for the TP itself. BECAUSE the product is now 4-in-1, less packaging is the result.

Second, I love love love that P&G has a Vice President of GLOBAL Sustainability. Congratulations to the World. Best of luck to Mr. Sauers.

Third, fantastic to ready that Fortune is highlighting this type of story on the impact that reduction of packaging can have to landfills and C02 emissions, as well as improving the number at the bottom line. The more that global companies similar to P&G hear about the cost-saving (essentially profit-making) aspect of sustainability-driven implementations to something as "simple" as packaging, the more they will be convinced make such simple changes themselves.

Fourth, I'd like to highlight the bit about how they market this to consumers. P&G are extremely market savvy. I'm sure they did loads of interviews with consumers to find out how to market this perfectly. This is great (though I have heard some people say that all marketers are evil evil evil) - what this does it practically guarantee that consumers will buy this product there-by reducing packaging consumption (= waste) without having to think about it! Which is exactly what they want - because consumers DON'T want to think about packaging, do they? They just want their damned soft, cushy TP!

Finally - and with a more questionable tone - I ask Lee Sauers, sir, do you seriously expect the educated public to believe that (to quote) "Environmental concerns are something P&G tries to work into products and packaging design on their own accord not necessarily pushed by consumers."? I'm sorry but Global Corporations with Huge Stakeholders don't just make this kind of move out of the goodness of their corporate hearts (sorry to say). They do it because consumers WANT this kind of approach to the products they NEED (to wipe their bums with). As I stated earlier, the company you keep is fantastic at being market driven. Based on this logic, P&G wouldn't do this if consumers weren't subconsciously clamoring for it. You did however use the words "not necessarily" so I guess you do have a bit of an out there. But I couldn't let that paragraph be overlooked. Hope you understand.

Anyway, congratulations for finding this consumer need and turning it into a reality (though other brands like Scott have been out there with this approach for years, albeit a bit scratchier on the bum).

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Globe Guard Products




Green Packaging Group



Martha's Circle


Sustainable is Good Copyright © 2007 - 2012

Privacy Policy